Creating Characters with True Grit
It's a rare movie that delivers writing lessons, but that's exactly what I got when I watched the remake of True Grit with Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon.
I had put off watching this movie for a long time, thinking the remake was just another sappy story about a kid demanding justice. I was wrong.
While the premise remained the same, the movie was grittier and more realistic than the original. A lot of the credit has to go to the script and the young girl who played Mattie (Hailie Steinfeld).
Without giving away too much of the movie, I noticed that with every turn, the director made things more and more dire for the protagonist. The odds remained stacked against Mattie to the very end.
We all know that's critical for a good story. But what impressed me was the depth (and risk) the director was willing to take by making the cost (vengeance) so dear that the ending actually shocked me.
Had the same events happened to the sheriff (Bridges) or the Texas Ranger (Damon), it would be sad, but acceptable. But because it was a child who deliberately placed herself in danger, it made the story all the more poignant and chilling. The movie ended up being part morality play and part drama.
It forced me to examine goal versus cost in my stories. I know I'm always too easy on my main characters in the first draft. It's only when I start tweaking that I squeeze every ounce of emotion by threatening the characters to the brink of their existence.
I'll never forget the frantic email I got from a reader when she found out what I did to poor Grey in Apocalypse Rising. I did the unthinkable and the reader feared for his life--the life of a fictional character.
I try to accomplish two things in a story. The protagonist must want something well out of his reach. And the cost must be so high that the reader is sure he'll fail.
In True Grit, Mattie is obsessive-compulsive. She will not take no for an answer and she's sees her path as crystal clear and resolute. She hires a sheriff known for his true grit because he's the only person who will have the same resolve as herself. They might be doing it for different reasons, but the goal is the same and that's all that's important to her.
In the original movie, John Wayne was the one depicted with true grit, (being his movie) but in the remake, this is more Mattie's story. She's the real character with 'true grit'. She is willing to risk it all and that resonated with me.
How far would you go to bring your father's killer to justice, to save a child, or the love of your life? How far did I go to find a beloved pet? Maybe the better question would be: What wouldn't we do?
If it's important to us, we do whatever it takes. That's what keeps us glued to the edge of our seats.
Second question for American history buffs: I know from reading Civil War letters that Americans spoke quite formally in the 1800s--as they do in this movie.
There are plenty of euphemisms and slang, but the dialog itself is stiffer and formal. Does anyone know when we started speaking more casually? If I were to venture a guess, I would say after WWI, but I honestly don't know for sure.
Comments
Ref formal speech, if you look at old films you'll find that for Britain it may have been post World War II. Have you seen 'Brief Encounter' : ). Seriously though with stuff like that it is hard to fix an artificial line - especially in a country as large as America - the norm would vary from state to state and from age group to age group.
And yeah, i have seen True Grit and though it was excellent on multiple levels. I also really loved the humor in it. Great movie
*minor spoiler alert*
Even in the end, she didn't let up about anything. As a grown woman, she was just as stiff as ever.
***
Pat: I keep thinking of the flappers and such. They looked pretty casual to me. I figured their language followed suit. :)
***
Sarah: The humor was good (and subtle). If you weren't paying attention to the conversation, you missed it.
***
Barbara: This is why I hypothesized that she was OCD. I expected her to soften a little.
Jackie: I was surprised to learn she was only 13 years old.
Ref: ...it had more appeal as it was made in a more "innocent" time period.
Movies from the 60s tended to be innocent and sometime naive. That was the time we were living in. This is why I prefer older movies when I'm feeling low.
You know what I'll be doing tonight!
***
Susan: I think the original was trying to show each of the main characters had true grit, but being the 60s, it was really John Wayne's film.
The remake made it clear that this was the girl's film in a very stark and profound way. I recommend it.
Hope you enjoy it!
I try not to consider certain things. My mind can wander to dark places, blank out and give the feral side of me permission to do things that probably wouldn't be right in the eyes of God or the devil if something terrible happened to say...my Chipmunk.
I didn't blame him in the least.
The characters in Deadwood speak quite formally too. It seems to me that as the years progress we tend to shorthand more and more. Maybe it's because we're all in so much of a hurry so we abbreviate things.
***
Shelley: Nowadays so many people text in shorthand. I wonder what our ancestors would think of that.
***
Linda: That's where I found it. Put it on one night and let me know what you thought of it.
Nope not seen True Grit in either version I'm afraid.
***
Madeleine: Westerns aren't my go-to genre, but this is worth seeing just to analyze story development.
www.modernworld4.blogspot.com
***
Cate: I don't think I've ever seen 3:10 to Yuma. I'll have to look that up.