Ethics and the Writer
There's been a lot of press lately about paid reviews, people who try to damage an author's career by leaving one-star reviews, and authors who use a pseudonym "similar" or the same as a famous author.
Let me add one more--authors who hijack an existing popular title and use it in part or whole for their own work. I'm not talking about parody books, but books that are simply using the title to catch unsuspecting readers.
But here's the thing about all these gray areas of ethical behavior. It's been happening since the beginning. No one has ever cornered the market on questionable behavior. It isn't new. It's just gone digital.
And what might seem vulgar to me might look like brilliant strategy to someone else.
The other day, I caught an ad on Craigslist from a guy begging people to give his books five-stars. Can we get any more brazen than to ask the man and woman on the street to give you five stars for a book they've never read? He didn't care if you read the books or even if you liked them. Maybe he thought this was smart marketing, but I was embarrassed for him.
But let's bring it closer to home. How many of you have left a "kind" review because that person was your friend and you didn't want to hurt his feelings? Is that any less ethical?
While I've never lied on a review, I once left off an issue that bugged me in a friend's book. No one else mentioned it, so it seems it was just a personal bugaboo. Still, if I were completely honest, I'd reveal warts and all.
On someone else's book, I found some grievous formatting errors. I opted to write the author rather than put it in my review so she could fix them. Whether she did or not, I don't know.
But let's bring it closer to home. How many of you have left a "kind" review because that person was your friend and you didn't want to hurt his feelings? Is that any less ethical?
While I've never lied on a review, I once left off an issue that bugged me in a friend's book. No one else mentioned it, so it seems it was just a personal bugaboo. Still, if I were completely honest, I'd reveal warts and all.
On someone else's book, I found some grievous formatting errors. I opted to write the author rather than put it in my review so she could fix them. Whether she did or not, I don't know.
Manipulation of the system is a constantly shifting beast subject to interpretation.
You're welcome to disagree with me if you think maneuvering readers to try a book is a means to the end.
As a tool, manipulation is successful in the short term. But if the writing turns out to be less than stellar, it'll hurt you for a lot longer than it helped.
As a tool, manipulation is successful in the short term. But if the writing turns out to be less than stellar, it'll hurt you for a lot longer than it helped.
Have you ever been unduly kind in a review to spare someone's feelings?
And for God's sakes, please don't say you did that for me. LOL!
Comments
As far as friends, it's tough. I've politely declined to review most books written by friends and acquaintances that I felt were subpar or that just weren't my cup of tea, because I felt I couldn't be honest without hurting them.
And no, I've never been unduly kind when reviewing your books.
Though occasionally I will review a book I loved because I want others to love it too.
That's interesting that you prefer to leave stars to reviews. I'm just the opposite. I've never liked stars.
To me, it reduces the book to a number and I don't see how I can rank a totally subjective experience to a number.
Sadly, this gets me off the hook as far as writing too-kind reviews for friends. If I like a book, I'll "Like" it on Amazon (or wherever) and I'll promote on my blog/Facebook and I'll even buy extra copies and give them as gifts, but I don't write reviews.
If I read a favorable review and purchase the book, the reviewer looks worse than the author if it turns out to be crap.
Always be honest, and if for any reason you can't be honest, don't write the review.
Any review I've done for you, Maria, hasn't been out of kindness. It was a reader's true feelings. And it would be the same today :-)
As to your books, Maria, I'm embarrassed to say I haven't read them, but Mikki has read two of them now and liked them a lot.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. How are you doing in your war against the scorpions?
I will write a review if I love a book. I will give it five stars, and do a quick review. However, I don't do reviews for friends, I don't lie, and if I don't like a novel there is no review. It's as simple as that. I also don't ask friend to undertake reviews.
I was sent an email recently by an author asking me to review their novel. I said, If I don't like it I won't be able to undertake a review. I didn't hear back from them. Hmmm. :)
I've seen a few authors rave on about their friends book, and I mean on and on, yet it does nothing for me to make me think it must be a great book.
I think deep down it is the sense of achievment for me. If someone likes my novels they'll do a review, and at times if they don't they still do a review. lol That's okay because I have to take the good with the bad.
Have a great day. :)
I read how some people refuse to leave bad reviews, but if everything is good, are you being honest? You might as well not leave ANY reviews at all.
I'm not saying to trash the author (I would never do that), but what's wrong with saying WHY you didn't like a certain book?
That's one of the nicest ways to truly show an author support.
Words are cheap, but talking with your wallet says buckets.
As long as you can preface it with: "I feel/think whatever" you've covered your integrity.
There is no one size fits all.
***
Angela: I actually like the way you do reviews. (Raelyn Barclay too). It's not high and mighty dissertation, but rather one reader talking to another.
You put me on your level rather than preach to me. I like it.
Ref: scorpions
We have them on the run, but they learn quickly. After two days, they're learning to avoid my traps. Da bums!
It's time consuming and often the last thing I think to do.
***
Stacy: Books are so personal. It's not like writing a review for a toaster. I can tell you precisely what I liked and what I didn't. But a book review is a series of intangibles.
When I read a review, all I want to know is if the author was consistent. Did she deliver a good ending? And were the characters believable? I don't really care about the reviewer's personal bugaboos. I just want to know if the story was worth opening my wallet.
Your post and other has got me thinking. Maybe I should stop. Mind you, it's not like I write a good review for a bad book.
I don't know any more.
***
Jenny: That's such a nice way to look at it. I like the idea of balance and reviewing for the sake of analysis.
I don't owe a review to the author, but I don't owe it to the reader either. I'm just sharing what I got out of it.
If it helps someone, fine. But my real reason to review is to analyze what I read, why I liked it, and why it stuck with me long after it was read.
I get turned off when authors beg for reviews. and I hate it when they review their own work while pretending to be a reader.
As for being "kind" in a review, I've done it to a degree. If the book has several issues, I will name most of them, but will let one slip by without me bringing it up. I think we all give our friends more leeway.
But I think you can have all the great reviews you want, it's still word of mouth that will have it sell well.
But in the digital world, this has been renamed as spam even though it's the same thing as a repeated commercial.
The best thing to do is to send your message to as many different communities and audiences.
***
Jennifer: But to play devil's advocate, don't all reviewers do that on some level? If something or someone resonates with us on an intimate level, don't we gush a little bit more than normal? And if something rubbed us the wrong way, aren't we more angry for seeing it in the book?
I read all reviews with a grain of salt and read between the lines.
***
Mike: I enjoy analyzing novels, but never as a job. You're right. It would seem too much like work. I analyze it more for myself anyway. And as long as I typed it out I might as well post it. LOL.
Renee writes great reviews! I always feel honored when she chooses to review me.
I always try my level best to give an honest review of a book I read but if I didn't like a book, I just don't review it.